Re poetry—I actually wonder if thousands of random phrase combinations might actually be enough for a tactful amalgamator to weave a good poem.
And LLMS do better than random. They aren’t trained well on scientific creativity (interesting hypothesis formation), but they do learn some notion of “good idea,” and reasoners tend to do even better at generating smart novelty when prompted well.
Re poetry—I actually wonder if thousands of random phrase combinations might actually be enough for a tactful amalgamator to weave a good poem.
And LLMS do better than random. They aren’t trained well on scientific creativity (interesting hypothesis formation), but they do learn some notion of “good idea,” and reasoners tend to do even better at generating smart novelty when prompted well.