I’m surprised that all groups have the same average Big Five Openness—I expected consequentialists to have higher openness, and deontologists to have lower openness.
Much of that sounds more like systematic effects than statistical fluctuations, though, so unless the systematic effects affects consequentialists and deontologists differently we should still see a difference in group averages if there was one; and the sample sizes are large enough that the statistical fluctuations should average away anyway.
I’m surprised that all groups have the same average Big Five Openness—I expected consequentialists to have higher openness, and deontologists to have lower openness.
Me too. However, I worry that the personality measures are not all that reliable, for reasons that the main survey article mentioned.
Much of that sounds more like systematic effects than statistical fluctuations, though, so unless the systematic effects affects consequentialists and deontologists differently we should still see a difference in group averages if there was one; and the sample sizes are large enough that the statistical fluctuations should average away anyway.