I’ve cited this post loads of times as an example of how a whole area of science with lots of gears and bells and whistles turns out to be entirely false. I think it’s a really valuable post from that perspective, and I’m really glad Scott wrote it.
There are some comments here suggesting the OP is not accurate, so I’ll really appreciate anyone who has the time to independently review it and see whether they reach Scott’s conclusions too.
I’ve cited this post loads of times as an example of how a whole area of science with lots of gears and bells and whistles turns out to be entirely false. I think it’s a really valuable post from that perspective, and I’m really glad Scott wrote it.
There are some comments here suggesting the OP is not accurate, so I’ll really appreciate anyone who has the time to independently review it and see whether they reach Scott’s conclusions too.