But you were arguing for them, weren’t you? It is the arguments that fail to convince me. I was not treating these as bald assertions.
No, I don’t argue that “a sufficiently intelligent intelligence would experience valence, or for that matter that it would necessarily even be conscious”. I think those statements are false.
No, I don’t argue that “a sufficiently intelligent intelligence would experience valence, or for that matter that it would necessarily even be conscious”. I think those statements are false.