What did you mess up?
announced it too late, underestimated how hard it would be to make the research guides, guaranteed personalized feedback to the first 300 applicants, also had the date for starting set too early, considering how much stuff was ready.
Guaranteeing personalized feedback for 300 people does seem like a massive burden.
Depending on what the application involved, would it work to anon them, make them public and sort of let the community give feedback?
What did you mess up?
announced it too late, underestimated how hard it would be to make the research guides, guaranteed personalized feedback to the first 300 applicants, also had the date for starting set too early, considering how much stuff was ready.
Guaranteeing personalized feedback for 300 people does seem like a massive burden.
Depending on what the application involved, would it work to anon them, make them public and sort of let the community give feedback?