I don’t make arguments for terminal values. I assert them.
Arguments that make any (epistemic) sense in this instance would be references to evidence to something that represents the value system (eg. neurological, behavioural or introspective observations about the relevant brain).
I don’t make arguments for terminal values. I assert them.
Arguments that make any (epistemic) sense in this instance would be references to evidence to something that represents the value system (eg. neurological, behavioural or introspective observations about the relevant brain).
Looks like I’ve been using “terminal values” incorrectly.