[....]
The psychopathic businessman In the past decade, the topic of psychopathy in business settings has similarly attracted increasing attention. Although such influential authors as Hervey Cleckley, David Lykken, Paul Babiak and Robert Hare have described vivid case examples of ruthless but prosperous businessmen who exhibited marked features of psychopathy, formal research on the implications of psychopathy in the workplace has been lacking – until recently.Recent work indicates that psychopathy is related to the use of hard negotiation tactics (e.g. threats of punishment: Jonason et al., 2012), bullying (Boddy, 2011), counterproductive workplace behaviour (e.g. theft by employees: O’Boyle et al., 2011), and poor management skills (Babiak et al., 2010). Although these results suggest that psychopathy has a marked ‘dark side’ in the workplace, there may be more to the story. Some authors have speculated that some psychopathic traits, such as charisma and interpersonal dominance, may contribute to effective leadership and management, at least in the short term (Babiak & Hare, 2006; Boddy et al., 2010; Furnham, 2007). Nevertheless, questions remain regarding the long-term effectiveness of such traits, with some suspecting that psychopathic traits tend eventually to be destructive.Recent research tentatively supports the view that psychopathy can be a double-edged sword in business settings. For example, data using the PCL-R show that psychopathic individuals are viewed as good communicators, strategic thinkers and innovators in the workplace (Babiak et al., 2010). More recently, unpublished research from our own lab has further elucidated the potential dual implications of psychopathy for workplace behaviour and leadership. In a sample of 312 North American community members, subdimensions of psychopathy, as measured by the PPI-R, were differentially related to leadership styles and counterproductive workplace behaviour. Specifically, Fearless Dominance was positively associated with adaptive leadership styles and minimally related to counterproductive workplace behaviour and maladaptive leadership styles. In contrast, Self-Centered Impulsivity was positively related to counterproductive workplace behaviour and negatively associated with adaptive leadership styles. In addition, individuals high on Fearless Dominance held more leadership positions over their lifetime than did other individuals.Although preliminary, these findings raise intriguing questions about the varied implications of psychopathic traits in the business world. Charisma, fearlessness, and willingness to take calculated business risks may predispose to business and leadership success. In contrast, certain features associated with psychopathy, such as impulsivity and lack of empathy, may do the opposite.
[......]
References
Babiak, P. & Hare, R.D. (2006). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. New York: HarperCollins. Babiak, P., Neumann, C.S. & Hare, R.D. (2010). Corporate psychopathy: Talking the walk. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28(2), 174–193. Benning, S.D., Patrick, C.J., Hicks, B.M. et al. (2003). Factor structure of the psychopathic personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 15, 340–350. Boddy, C.R. (2011). The corporate psychopaths theory of the global financial crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 255–259. Boddy, C.R., Ladyshewsky, R.K. & Galvin, P. (2010). The influence of corporate psychopaths on corporate social responsibility and organizational commitment to employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 1–19. Brodie. F.M. (1967). The devil drives: A life of Sir Richard Burton. New York: Norton. Burton, I. (1893). The life of Captain Sir Richard F. Burton KCMG, FRGS (Vols. 1 and 2). London: Chapman and Hall. Cale, E.M. & Lilienfeld, S.O. (2002). Histrionic personality disorder and antisocial personality disorder: Sex-differentiated manifestations of psychopathy? Journal of Personality Disorders, 16(1), 52–72. Cleckley, H. (1982). The mask of sanity (6th edn). St Louis, MO: Mosby. (First published 1941) Connelly, B.S. & Ones, D.S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1092. Falkenbach, D. & Tsoukalas, M. (2011, May). Can adaptive traits be observed in hero populations? Poster presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Psychopathy, Montreal, Canada. Fowles, D.C. & Dindo, L. (2009). Temperament and psychopathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 179–183. Furnham, A. (2007). Personality disorders and derailment at work: The paradoxical positive in?uence of pathology in the workplace. In J. Langan-Fox et al. (Eds.) Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Goodwin, D.K. (2013). The bully pulpit. New York: Simon & Schuster. Hall, J.R. & Benning, S.D. (2006). The ‘successful’ psychopath. In C.J. Patrick (Ed.) Handbook of psychopathy (pp.459–475). New York: Guilford. Hare, R.D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems. Hicks, B.M., Markon, K.E., Patrick, C.J., et al. (2004). Identifying psychopathy subtypes on the basis of personality structure. Psychological assessment, 16(3), 276–288. Hogan, R., Raskin, R. & Fazzini, D. (1990). The dark side of leadership. In K.E. Clark & M.B. Clark (Eds.) Measures of leadership. West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America. Jonason, P.K., Slomski, S. & Partyka, J. (2012). The dark triad at work: How toxic employees get their way. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 449–453. Judge, T.A. & LePine, J.A. (2007). 20 The bright and dark sides of personality: Implications for personnel selection in individual and team contexts. In J. Langan-Fox et al. (Eds.) Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Judge, T.A., Piccolo, R.F. & Kosalka, T. (2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(6), 855–875. Kiehl, K. & Lushing, J. (2014). Psychopathy. In Scholarpedia. Retrieved from http://scholarpedia.org/article/psychopathy Lilienfeld, S.O., Patrick, C.J., Benning, S.D. et al. (2012). The role of fearless dominance in psychopathy: Confusions, controversies, and clarifications. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3(3), 327–340. Lilienfeld, S.O., Waldman, I.D., Landfield, K. et al. (2012). Fearless dominance and the US presidency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 489–505. Lilienfeld, S.O. & Widows, M.R. (2005). Psychopathic Personality Inventory – Revised: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Lykken, D.T. (1982, September). Fearlessness: Its carefree charm and deadly risks. Psychology Today, pp.20–28. Lykken, D.T. (1995). The antisocial personalities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Lykken, D.T. (2006). Psychopathic personality: The scope of the problem. In C.J. Patrick (Ed.) Handbook of psychopathy. New York: Guilford. Miller, J.D., Jones, S.E. & Lynam, D.R. (2011). Psychopathic traits from the perspective of self and informant reports: Is there evidence for a lack of insight? Journal of abnormal psychology, 120(3), 758–764. Miller, J.D. & Lynam, D.R. (2012). An examination of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory’s nomological network. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 305–326. Miller, J.D., Rauscher, S. Hyatt, C.S. et al. (2013). Examining the relations among pain tolerance, psychopathic traits, and violent and non-violent antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0035072 Neumann, C.S., Malterer, M.B. & Newman, J.P. (2008). Factor structure of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI): Findings from a large incarcerated sample. Psychological Assessment, 20, 169–174. O’Boyle, E.H., Jr, Forsyth, D.R., Banks, G.C. & McDaniel, M.A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579. Santosa, C.M., Strong, C.M., Nowakowska, C. et al. (2007). Enhanced creativity in bipolar disorder patients. Journal of Affective Disorders, 100(1), 31–39. Skeem, J.L., Polaschek, D.L., Patrick, C. J. & Lilienfeld, S.O. (2011). Psychopathic personality bridging the gap between scientific evidence and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(3), 95–162. Smith, S.F., Lilienfeld, S.O., Coffey, K. & Dabbs, J.M. (2013). Are psychopaths and heroes twigs off the same branch? Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 634–646. Walsh, A. & Wu, H.H. (2008). Differentiating antisocial personality disorder, psychopathy, and sociopathy. Criminal Justice Studies, 21, 135–152. Widom, C.S. (1977). A methodology for studying noninstitutionalized psychopaths. Journal of ConsultinV
It is a good idea, after posting a comment, to look at the comment to check that it says what you meant it to say, in the way you meant to say it. In this case, you need at the very least to reference the source, replace every carriage return in the source by two, replace the link with one that works, and see if the actual text is what you thought you pasted. (What appears above is truncated.) Most of the references are not referenced in the quoted text and should be cut.
At present, it reads as if you do not intend it to actually be read.
Those who do will find this gem of vacuity:
Some authors have speculated that some psychopathic traits, such as charisma and interpersonal dominance, may contribute to effective leadership and management, at least in the short term
Leaders have charisma and interpersonal dominance, psychopaths have charisma and interpersonal dominance, therefore… what? And listen to the melody these words are set to:
Some authors have speculated … some … may contribute … at least in the short term
Was I trying to prove the point that business leaders are definitely psychopaths, or the point that there is a lot of research on the topic?
You just dumped a popular-level article from a psychology magazine with a wall of references. Whatever you were trying to do, it fails to do either of those.
Have you noticed him handwavey the opposing arguments are?
Taking that as “how”, not “him”, I haven’t seen opposing arguments, just a pointing out that the argument for is not well sustained by the sources.
[....] The psychopathic businessman In the past decade, the topic of psychopathy in business settings has similarly attracted increasing attention. Although such influential authors as Hervey Cleckley, David Lykken, Paul Babiak and Robert Hare have described vivid case examples of ruthless but prosperous businessmen who exhibited marked features of psychopathy, formal research on the implications of psychopathy in the workplace has been lacking – until recently.Recent work indicates that psychopathy is related to the use of hard negotiation tactics (e.g. threats of punishment: Jonason et al., 2012), bullying (Boddy, 2011), counterproductive workplace behaviour (e.g. theft by employees: O’Boyle et al., 2011), and poor management skills (Babiak et al., 2010). Although these results suggest that psychopathy has a marked ‘dark side’ in the workplace, there may be more to the story. Some authors have speculated that some psychopathic traits, such as charisma and interpersonal dominance, may contribute to effective leadership and management, at least in the short term (Babiak & Hare, 2006; Boddy et al., 2010; Furnham, 2007). Nevertheless, questions remain regarding the long-term effectiveness of such traits, with some suspecting that psychopathic traits tend eventually to be destructive.Recent research tentatively supports the view that psychopathy can be a double-edged sword in business settings. For example, data using the PCL-R show that psychopathic individuals are viewed as good communicators, strategic thinkers and innovators in the workplace (Babiak et al., 2010). More recently, unpublished research from our own lab has further elucidated the potential dual implications of psychopathy for workplace behaviour and leadership. In a sample of 312 North American community members, subdimensions of psychopathy, as measured by the PPI-R, were differentially related to leadership styles and counterproductive workplace behaviour. Specifically, Fearless Dominance was positively associated with adaptive leadership styles and minimally related to counterproductive workplace behaviour and maladaptive leadership styles. In contrast, Self-Centered Impulsivity was positively related to counterproductive workplace behaviour and negatively associated with adaptive leadership styles. In addition, individuals high on Fearless Dominance held more leadership positions over their lifetime than did other individuals.Although preliminary, these findings raise intriguing questions about the varied implications of psychopathic traits in the business world. Charisma, fearlessness, and willingness to take calculated business risks may predispose to business and leadership success. In contrast, certain features associated with psychopathy, such as impulsivity and lack of empathy, may do the opposite. [......] References
Babiak, P. & Hare, R.D. (2006). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. New York: HarperCollins. Babiak, P., Neumann, C.S. & Hare, R.D. (2010). Corporate psychopathy: Talking the walk. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28(2), 174–193. Benning, S.D., Patrick, C.J., Hicks, B.M. et al. (2003). Factor structure of the psychopathic personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 15, 340–350. Boddy, C.R. (2011). The corporate psychopaths theory of the global financial crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 255–259. Boddy, C.R., Ladyshewsky, R.K. & Galvin, P. (2010). The influence of corporate psychopaths on corporate social responsibility and organizational commitment to employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 1–19. Brodie. F.M. (1967). The devil drives: A life of Sir Richard Burton. New York: Norton. Burton, I. (1893). The life of Captain Sir Richard F. Burton KCMG, FRGS (Vols. 1 and 2). London: Chapman and Hall. Cale, E.M. & Lilienfeld, S.O. (2002). Histrionic personality disorder and antisocial personality disorder: Sex-differentiated manifestations of psychopathy? Journal of Personality Disorders, 16(1), 52–72. Cleckley, H. (1982). The mask of sanity (6th edn). St Louis, MO: Mosby. (First published 1941) Connelly, B.S. & Ones, D.S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1092. Falkenbach, D. & Tsoukalas, M. (2011, May). Can adaptive traits be observed in hero populations? Poster presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Psychopathy, Montreal, Canada. Fowles, D.C. & Dindo, L. (2009). Temperament and psychopathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 179–183. Furnham, A. (2007). Personality disorders and derailment at work: The paradoxical positive in?uence of pathology in the workplace. In J. Langan-Fox et al. (Eds.) Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Goodwin, D.K. (2013). The bully pulpit. New York: Simon & Schuster. Hall, J.R. & Benning, S.D. (2006). The ‘successful’ psychopath. In C.J. Patrick (Ed.) Handbook of psychopathy (pp.459–475). New York: Guilford. Hare, R.D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems. Hicks, B.M., Markon, K.E., Patrick, C.J., et al. (2004). Identifying psychopathy subtypes on the basis of personality structure. Psychological assessment, 16(3), 276–288. Hogan, R., Raskin, R. & Fazzini, D. (1990). The dark side of leadership. In K.E. Clark & M.B. Clark (Eds.) Measures of leadership. West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America. Jonason, P.K., Slomski, S. & Partyka, J. (2012). The dark triad at work: How toxic employees get their way. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 449–453. Judge, T.A. & LePine, J.A. (2007). 20 The bright and dark sides of personality: Implications for personnel selection in individual and team contexts. In J. Langan-Fox et al. (Eds.) Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Judge, T.A., Piccolo, R.F. & Kosalka, T. (2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(6), 855–875. Kiehl, K. & Lushing, J. (2014). Psychopathy. In Scholarpedia. Retrieved from http://scholarpedia.org/article/psychopathy Lilienfeld, S.O., Patrick, C.J., Benning, S.D. et al. (2012). The role of fearless dominance in psychopathy: Confusions, controversies, and clarifications. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3(3), 327–340. Lilienfeld, S.O., Waldman, I.D., Landfield, K. et al. (2012). Fearless dominance and the US presidency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 489–505. Lilienfeld, S.O. & Widows, M.R. (2005). Psychopathic Personality Inventory – Revised: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Lykken, D.T. (1982, September). Fearlessness: Its carefree charm and deadly risks. Psychology Today, pp.20–28. Lykken, D.T. (1995). The antisocial personalities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Lykken, D.T. (2006). Psychopathic personality: The scope of the problem. In C.J. Patrick (Ed.) Handbook of psychopathy. New York: Guilford. Miller, J.D., Jones, S.E. & Lynam, D.R. (2011). Psychopathic traits from the perspective of self and informant reports: Is there evidence for a lack of insight? Journal of abnormal psychology, 120(3), 758–764. Miller, J.D. & Lynam, D.R. (2012). An examination of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory’s nomological network. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 305–326. Miller, J.D., Rauscher, S. Hyatt, C.S. et al. (2013). Examining the relations among pain tolerance, psychopathic traits, and violent and non-violent antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0035072 Neumann, C.S., Malterer, M.B. & Newman, J.P. (2008). Factor structure of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI): Findings from a large incarcerated sample. Psychological Assessment, 20, 169–174. O’Boyle, E.H., Jr, Forsyth, D.R., Banks, G.C. & McDaniel, M.A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579. Santosa, C.M., Strong, C.M., Nowakowska, C. et al. (2007). Enhanced creativity in bipolar disorder patients. Journal of Affective Disorders, 100(1), 31–39. Skeem, J.L., Polaschek, D.L., Patrick, C. J. & Lilienfeld, S.O. (2011). Psychopathic personality bridging the gap between scientific evidence and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(3), 95–162. Smith, S.F., Lilienfeld, S.O., Coffey, K. & Dabbs, J.M. (2013). Are psychopaths and heroes twigs off the same branch? Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 634–646. Walsh, A. & Wu, H.H. (2008). Differentiating antisocial personality disorder, psychopathy, and sociopathy. Criminal Justice Studies, 21, 135–152. Widom, C.S. (1977). A methodology for studying noninstitutionalized psychopaths. Journal of ConsultinV
It is a good idea, after posting a comment, to look at the comment to check that it says what you meant it to say, in the way you meant to say it. In this case, you need at the very least to reference the source, replace every carriage return in the source by two, replace the link with one that works, and see if the actual text is what you thought you pasted. (What appears above is truncated.) Most of the references are not referenced in the quoted text and should be cut.
At present, it reads as if you do not intend it to actually be read.
Those who do will find this gem of vacuity:
Leaders have charisma and interpersonal dominance, psychopaths have charisma and interpersonal dominance, therefore… what? And listen to the melody these words are set to:
Not exactly a testable hypothesis, is it?
Was I trying to prove the point that business leaders are definitely psychopaths, or the point that there is a lot of research on the topic?
Have you noticed him handwavey the opposing arguments are?
You just dumped a popular-level article from a psychology magazine with a wall of references. Whatever you were trying to do, it fails to do either of those.
Taking that as “how”, not “him”, I haven’t seen opposing arguments, just a pointing out that the argument for is not well sustained by the sources.
ETA: This is indeed handwaving.
I hate to the bearer of bad news, but the “drown ’em in bullshit” tactic doesn’t work well on LW...
So you looked up the best available evidence , steelmanned it, and then critiques it?