I personally think more AIxNuclear stuff would be very valuable, especially if it’s from a properly ASI-pilled perspective. A lot of existing writing on AI‘s effect on nuclear deterrence is either mired in an AI as a Normal Technology perspective, or doesn’t follow the implications all the way through to the end. There’s plenty of natsec people that will agree that AGI is a Big Deal (TM), but refuse to consider what happens if that lets you do crazy things like automating your industrial base and get it to grow exponentially.
Damn, you stole a broad thrust of my essay idea. Good post wish I would have developed mine quicker
I personally think more AIxNuclear stuff would be very valuable, especially if it’s from a properly ASI-pilled perspective. A lot of existing writing on AI‘s effect on nuclear deterrence is either mired in an AI as a Normal Technology perspective, or doesn’t follow the implications all the way through to the end. There’s plenty of natsec people that will agree that AGI is a Big Deal (TM), but refuse to consider what happens if that lets you do crazy things like automating your industrial base and get it to grow exponentially.