But you do agree that in my corrected version, EDT half of the agents miss one smoking opportunity?
E.g. Suppose someone decided to collect statistics for the first time, and will do it again 10 years later. They discover that smoking correlates with cancer and moreover find out that it’s entirely through the lesion. For next 10 years EDT agents do not smoke. All CDT agents do smoke. Then they collect the statistic again, and there is no correlation. EDT agents start smoking too or what? So, they just missed some smoking time?
Like, wouldn’t acting on this correlation destroy the correlation?
But you do agree that in my corrected version, EDT half of the agents miss one smoking opportunity?
E.g. Suppose someone decided to collect statistics for the first time, and will do it again 10 years later. They discover that smoking correlates with cancer and moreover find out that it’s entirely through the lesion. For next 10 years EDT agents do not smoke. All CDT agents do smoke. Then they collect the statistic again, and there is no correlation. EDT agents start smoking too or what? So, they just missed some smoking time?
Like, wouldn’t acting on this correlation destroy the correlation?