But if physics is a serious field, then “just enough physics to get away with it” should be enough physics that the paper actually deserves to be published. How could a serious reviewer in a serious field get fooled by something that isn’t a serious physics paper?
I mean, maybe they’re a really good parody artist who studied just enough physics to get away with it.
But if physics is a serious field, then “just enough physics to get away with it” should be enough physics that the paper actually deserves to be published. How could a serious reviewer in a serious field get fooled by something that isn’t a serious physics paper?