I make no such point. If you read the post, nowhere do I assume any specific relation between [p(L)*j—t] and e—my point is specifically that you should use something with no dependence on your calculation (and strictly more reliable) to draw conclusions from when you’re not sure.
I make no such point. If you read the post, nowhere do I assume any specific relation between [p(L)*j—t] and e—my point is specifically that you should use something with no dependence on your calculation (and strictly more reliable) to draw conclusions from when you’re not sure.