Why should that be an interesting question? (What’s “transhumanism”, again?) What matters is whether this allows you to find correct decisions, perhaps whether it’s a useful sense of “correct” to rely on when you have something to protect.
It seemed relevant to the parent’s objection to the original article.
Why should that be an interesting question? (What’s “transhumanism”, again?) What matters is whether this allows you to find correct decisions, perhaps whether it’s a useful sense of “correct” to rely on when you have something to protect.
It seemed relevant to the parent’s objection to the original article.