I’ve edited to cancel my statement “Some people may feel intimidated by such an argument, and this can continue to turn off the post so that it collapsed (hidden).) I just want to make clear to someone of this type to appreciate and not easily turn off the post. I do not understand the lesswrong, whether some people who turn off an article by doing a few times downvoted, will result in an article not visible to all readers. But if downvoted for many times does not make an article to be collapsed, only to certain people, then it’s certainly a very good thing.”
I understand now. On LessWrong it’s about share honestly with the spirit of seeking truth. Thanks.
There are some people who are so sure about something 100%, but some are not. They assume there is no 100% proof of God. Whether our future is determined by more number of decisions with 100% accuracy? Not always. But even when dealing with everyday life we do not always have to require 100% accuracy.
It is an art to analyze and decide. Its strength lies not on getting a solution 100%, but with our limitations in finding solutions or answers which are not 100% it can lead us to overcome the problem or even put us in the future in the best condition that can be earned, and it’s just through using only accuracy equal to less than 100%.
It’s a matter of proficiency that can only be proven after a period of time. It’s unique, personal, that’s why this is the art of making wise decision.
When faced with the possibility, there is a way to face possibility is to let one of possibility and see if it leads to something more definite. Diversity in the future will narrow the chances of the possibility of something, and it will clarify for the possibility of something (from the past) in the future.
I consider there is God. I have proof of existence of God. You may try to read at: http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/51d/there_is_god/