So after the suggestion I made above (which doesn’t seem to have posted, sp nevermind), I tried John Paul II’s Veritas Splendor and got a result of 100% human. Then I thought, “Well, that’s interesting. Maybe the OP is right! But I better check. Leo’s encylical. ” So I signed up for the free (4 checks a day) version of Pangram, trying to reproduce your results...and mine were very different. I checked from the beginning through part of the Babel section and got a result of 100% human every time. I don’t see a way to post screenshots below but I am happy to send them along. Bottom line, Pangram-as far as I was able to use it for free—says the encyclical is 100% human (at least in English). I’m not sure what to make of these different results, but they differ wildly from yours. Happy to providw receipts.
So after the suggestion I made above (which doesn’t seem to have posted, sp nevermind), I tried John Paul II’s Veritas Splendor and got a result of 100% human. Then I thought, “Well, that’s interesting. Maybe the OP is right! But I better check. Leo’s encylical. ” So I signed up for the free (4 checks a day) version of Pangram, trying to reproduce your results...and mine were very different. I checked from the beginning through part of the Babel section and got a result of 100% human every time. I don’t see a way to post screenshots below but I am happy to send them along. Bottom line, Pangram-as far as I was able to use it for free—says the encyclical is 100% human (at least in English). I’m not sure what to make of these different results, but they differ wildly from yours. Happy to providw receipts.