DusanDNesic

• DusanDNesic 10 Nov 2025 9:41 UTC

  1 point

  0

  on: One Shot Sin­ga­long­ing is an at­ti­tude, not a skill or a song-difficulty-level*

  Yeah, this is hard, and important to making an event like this fun!

  A few random thoughts:

  In leadership training a warm-up exercise was “I’ll sing this [nonsense tune with lyrics on the whiteboard, similar to singing Game of Thrones tune, but people don’t know the melody already] as loud as I can. Your goal as a group is to be louder than one of me.” The presenter was obviously a loud guy, but it normalized everyone shouting as he would do it first and we’d just aim to match in a way that felt normal even in the corporate office setting. I’ve ran this a few times even with quite strong cultural gaps and nors against me, and it worked every time.

  This reminds me of Bring the Light which I assume was a warm up song with simple lyrics, still good meaning and fun to do (remotely at least! :) ). More like that!

  Music in clubs is repetitive, and at least Serbian Turbo-Folk has very predictable rhymes—from one line’s content and ending you can guess the likely next line, allowing you to sing along to a song you never heard before!

  I assume other cultures have songs like our Bećarac which have one person sing a line, everyone repeats, then they sing another line (usually a subversion of expectations theoug a pun or ending the line without a rhyming word because the rhyming word would have been naughty) and everyone repeats (with laughter). These can be also made on the spot alongside a canon of existing ones and are quite fun—kind of rap battles and disses of old, but much easier to craft.

  Anyhow, best of luck, shame I’ll miss it, but I’ll catch it one year!

• DusanDNesic 9 Nov 2025 18:01 UTC

  12 points

  2

  on: Mourn­ing a life with­out AI

  I deeply feel this, especially as I fear that my son has a chance of needing to cyborgize himself to compete in the new world more than I’ve had to (glasses and phone). I have a preference for him being human to non-human and I’m not sure what the future holds for him.

  At the same time, I cannot speak for anyone else and your calculus will be different in different situations, but if the world ended tomorrow I’d still have loved the two years I spent with him and he’d prefer existence to not having existed for that time. If your timelines give you move than 2 years of life of a child, I think it’s worthwhile, unless you have high S-risks fears.

• DusanDNesic 20 Oct 2025 19:25 UTC

  8 points

  2

  in reply to: niplav’s comment on: Hu­man­ity Learned Al­most Noth­ing From COVID-19

  For completeness, I’ve also seen mil., bil. and tril. - but never with o at the end.

• DusanDNesic 9 Oct 2025 9:52 UTC

  9 points

  0

  on: Mak­ing Your Pain Worse can Get You What You Want

  My past self is super guilty of this and for a decade now working on it—I’m a younger brother, and being unable to do a thing was a sure way to get someone else to do it (i.e. someone older), so I’d make myself unable to do it (through making myself tired, hurting myself in the process by doing it recklessly or other not-quite-conscious but actually beneficial to me strategies). It’s a pattern I noticed at 16, but didn’t fix until 23 or so, and I still find a part of me scheming to do similar stuff. An issue I have now is that my 2 year old has absolutely learned this—he wants to roll up his sleeves, he gives it a horrible effort, and starts crying at the failure, waiting for us to fix it. Instead I guide him to do it since he can do it with patience and effort, and he seems happy to do it, and for some things he just learned it and is now not having the pattern—but it doesn’t generalize, he does it for new challenges. It’ll just take time, but it really starts early.

• DusanDNesic 15 Sep 2025 19:57 UTC

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: KvmanThinking’s comment on: The El­dritch in the 21st century

  IMO the part about Bureaucracy is likely not true 10k years ago, although it is (as you cite) 6k years ago. The Academia part is not clear to me as a parallel—becoming a priest was (I would expect) mostly a thing of actual belief, as people used to actually believe things, in ways that our Academia (the Eldritch kind) is not.

• DusanDNesic 8 Sep 2025 19:05 UTC

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: Nina Panickssery’s comment on: Breast­feed­ing and IQ: Effects shrink as you con­trol for more confounders

  AFAIK the breast milk also contains antibodies which reduces the number of sick days in infants, on priors that should also have a (small) positive effect.

• DusanDNesic 7 Sep 2025 19:15 UTC

  4 points

  0

  on: When Both Peo­ple Are In­ter­ested, How Often Is Flir­ta­tious Es­ca­la­tion Mu­tual?

  Anecdata:

  My wife is usually much better at telling when a girl was flirting, and when bets are made, she confirms later with the person on the side (these are usually people she already knows and so people who trust her, but also she maybe can read their particular tells, confounding the result). I often would read the same signals as “she’s just having a good time with me/​the person” and be wrong. I’m not sure if I have the same advantage for men, I do more often bet on them flirting than she does, but I usual am unable to have independent confirmation, it’s random men we observe being possibly flirty.

  Maybe it’s just the case that both of us see our genders as more flirty than the other does, and that bet pays on average? I’m not sure, that doesn’t feel like it explains my wife’s accuracy or my inaccuracy in predicting female flirting (although my prediction did get better through time).

• DusanDNesic 26 May 2025 22:12 UTC

  3 points

  0

  in reply to: Benquo’s comment on: Ori­ent­ing Toward Wizard Power

  As a father of an almost-two-years-old who is infinitely curious, I would benefit greatly from a write-up of what you found works and doesn’t. I also don’t live in the West and visit only occasionally so it is costly to buy things to try out; I’d appreciate learning from your experience!

• DusanDNesic 11 Feb 2025 10:56 UTC

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: Ruby’s comment on: What is malev­olence? On the na­ture, mea­sure­ment, and dis­tri­bu­tion of dark traits

  Oh, I didn’t notice, but yeah, just a link to it, not the whole text!

• DusanDNesic 10 Feb 2025 12:43 UTC

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: Ruby’s comment on: What is malev­olence? On the na­ture, mea­sure­ment, and dis­tri­bu­tion of dark traits

  I did somehow get this in my email, so it is curated?

• DusanDNesic 10 Jan 2025 22:48 UTC

  6 points

  −2

  on: Hu­man takeover might be worse than AI takeover

  Quicky thoughts, not fully fledged, sorry.

  Maybe it depends on the precise way you see the human take-over, but some benefits of Stalin over Clippy include:

  Humans have to sleep, have biological functions, and have need to be validated and loved etc which is useful for everyone else.

  Humans also have limited life span and their progeny has decent random chances of wanting things to go well for everyone.

  Humans are mortal and posses one body which can be harmed if need be making them more likely to cooperate with other humans.

• DusanDNesic 10 Jan 2025 22:41 UTC

  3 points

  0

  on: Some ar­gu­ments against a land value tax

  A crux I have on the point about disincentivising developers from developing parts of their own land—how common is this? In my own country, the answer is—not at all, almost all development comes from the government building infrastructure, schools, etc. and developers buy land near where they know the government will build a metro line or whatever to leech off the benefits. Is the situation in the US that developers often buy big plots of cheap land and develop them with roads, hospitals, schools, to benefit from the rise in value of all the other land?

• DusanDNesic 10 Jan 2025 22:32 UTC

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: Matthew Barnett’s comment on: Some ar­gu­ments against a land value tax

  I think this view is quite US-centric as in fact most countries in the world do not include mineral rights with the land ownership (and yet, minerals are explored everywhere, not just US, meaning imo that profit motive is alive and well when you need to buy licences on top of the land, it’s just priced in differently). From Claude:

  In a relatively small number of countries, private landowners own mineral rights (including oil) under their property. The United States is the most notable example, where private mineral rights are common through the concept of “mineral estate.” Even in the US though, there are some limitations and government regulations on extraction.

  The vast majority of countries follow the “state ownership” model, where subsurface minerals including oil are owned by the government regardless of who owns the surface land. This includes:

  Most of Europe (including UK, France, Germany)

  Russia

  China

  Most Middle Eastern countries

  Most African nations

  Most Latin American countries

  Canada (where the provinces generally own mineral rights)

  Mexico (where oil specifically is constitutionally defined as state property)

  Australia (where states own mineral rights)

  Even in countries that technically allow private mineral ownership, state-owned companies often have exclusive rights to develop oil resources (like Saudi Aramco in Saudi Arabia or PEMEX in Mexico).

  The US system of widespread private mineral rights is quite unique globally. There are a few other countries that have limited forms of private mineral rights, but none with the same extensive private ownership system as the US.

PIBBSS Fel­low­ship 2025: Boun­ties and Co­op­er­a­tive AI Track Announcement

• DusanDNesic 27 Dec 2024 10:04 UTC

  36 points

  29

  in reply to: Tahp’s comment on: The Field of AI Align­ment: A Post­mortem, and What To Do About It

  It sounds like you should apply for the PIBBSS Fellowship! (https://​​pibbss.ai/​​fellowship/​​)

Ap­ply to the 2025 PIBBSS Sum­mer Re­search Fellowship

Ret­ro­spec­tive: PIBBSS Fel­low­ship 2024

• DusanDNesic 15 Dec 2024 22:39 UTC

  1 point

  0

  on: “Char­ity” as a con­fla­tion­ary al­li­ance term

  Excellent article, and helpful by introducing vocabulary that makes me think things which I was trying to understand. Perhaps it should be cross posted to EA Forum?

• DusanDNesic 30 Nov 2024 22:39 UTC

  1 point

  2

  in reply to: Alexander Gietelink Oldenziel’s comment on: Alexan­der Gietelink Ol­den­z­iel’s Shortform

  Future wars are about to look very silly.

• DusanDNesic 5 Nov 2024 8:40 UTC

  2 points

  0

  on: Live Machin­ery: In­ter­face De­sign Work­shop for AI Safety @ EA Hotel

  I’m very sad I cannot attend at that time, but I am hyped about this and believe it to be valuable, so I am writing this endorsement as a signal to others. I’ve also recommended this to some of my friends, but alas UK visa is hard to get on such short notice. When you run it in Serbia, we’ll have more folks from the eastern bloc represented ;)