The challenge of unawareness for impartial altruist action guidance

The core posts of this sequence are the posts numbered 1-4 in the titles, which introduce the problem of unawareness and its significant implications for cause prioritization.

“Winning isn’t enough” and “Should you go with your best guess?” are background. The essential content from those posts is summarized in the core sequence, but I strongly recommend reading the background posts in full beforehand.

Win­ning isn’t enough

Should you go with your best guess?: Against pre­cise Bayesi­anism and re­lated views

1. The challenge of un­aware­ness for im­par­tial al­tru­ist ac­tion guidance: Introduction

2. Why in­tu­itive com­par­i­sons of large-scale im­pact are unjustified

3. Why im­par­tial al­tru­ists should sus­pend judg­ment un­der unawareness

4. Why ex­ist­ing ap­proaches to cause pri­ori­ti­za­tion are not ro­bust to unawareness

Re­source guide: Unaware­ness, in­de­ter­mi­nacy, and cluelessness