In the spirit of pointing out local invalidities, the first paragraph (while perhaps true) is a display of learning from fictional evidence, which is usually regarded as fallacious.
Therefore I have weak-downvoted your comment. It would be much improved by trying to learn from real-world cases (which might as well support the position).
In the spirit of pointing out local invalidities, the first paragraph (while perhaps true) is a display of learning from fictional evidence, which is usually regarded as fallacious.
Therefore I have weak-downvoted your comment. It would be much improved by trying to learn from real-world cases (which might as well support the position).