Another relativistic argument against time flowing is that simultaneity is only defined relative to a reference frame. Therefore, there is no unified present which is supposed to be what is flowing.
Relativity does not make the arrow of time relative to observer. Events in one’s future light cone remain in their future light cone also from a perspective of someone else.
Relativity does not make the arrow of time relative to observer. Events in one’s future light cone remain in their future light cone also from a perspective of someone else.
“Relativity does not make the arrow of time relative to observer”—I didn’t say that. I said there was no unified notion of the present
Yes, but the direction of causality is very much preserved. The notion of present is not necessary in a directed acyclic graph.