Either may themselves argue in ways that lean on the other’s work, but I think it’s good practice to let them do this explicitly, rather than assuming ‘MIRI references a paper’ means ‘the author of that paper, in a different part of that paper, is reciting the MIRI party line’. These are just discreet parties.
Yeah extremely fair, I wrote this quickly. I don’t mean to attribute to Greenblatt the MIRI view.
Yeah extremely fair, I wrote this quickly. I don’t mean to attribute to Greenblatt the MIRI view.