“Would you kill babies if it was the right thing to do? If no, under what circumstances would you not do the right thing to do? If yes, how right would it have to be, for how many babies?”
I would have answered “yes”; eg., I would have set off a bomb in Hitler’s car in 1942, even if Hitler was surrounded by babies. This doesn’t seem to be a case of corruption by unethical hardware; the benefit to me from setting off such a bomb is quite negative, as it greatly increases my chance of being tortured to death by the SS.
Definitely yes. It’s not like killing babies is inherently wrong (*), it just is under most circumstances. I was thinking more along the lines of euthanasia of babies you’ve discovered have been prepared for use in biological warfare… but my mind tends to go into bad places. Let’s not get any further into that.
*) unless you use absolute values for wrong, in which case it definitely is, but so is breathing
“Would you kill babies if it was the right thing to do? If no, under what circumstances would you not do the right thing to do? If yes, how right would it have to be, for how many babies?”
I would have answered “yes”; eg., I would have set off a bomb in Hitler’s car in 1942, even if Hitler was surrounded by babies. This doesn’t seem to be a case of corruption by unethical hardware; the benefit to me from setting off such a bomb is quite negative, as it greatly increases my chance of being tortured to death by the SS.
Definitely yes. It’s not like killing babies is inherently wrong (*), it just is under most circumstances. I was thinking more along the lines of euthanasia of babies you’ve discovered have been prepared for use in biological warfare… but my mind tends to go into bad places. Let’s not get any further into that.
*) unless you use absolute values for wrong, in which case it definitely is, but so is breathing