I ended up as part of a team managing the internal communication & knowledge platform for a company that was at the time (early 2020) about ~100,000 employees, now ~146,000. My area of responsibility now includes over 20,000 employees, but I do not directly oversee anyone. I did not have education or much experience particular to this domain, but somehow became a preferred pick for the role, so make of that what you will.
The strategy I’ve always tried to employ is to treat everyone as intelligent equals, and making as much effort as possible to understand, and earnestly explain, the way things are “supposed” to work in a bureaucratic perspective — who needs to approve, what process needs to be followed, while at the same time consciously addressing instances where what people want/need might be different, and that bureaucracies must be understood in that context. In other words, be aware of the Chesterton’s fence principle, but also be aware that taking down the fence is an option that may need to be discussed.
The most common… I don’t want to say “obstacle” because that feels so strong, but the thing I most often have to be consciously aware of, is getting the input of everyone whose input should be included. You have to actively seek it out, and push people to give input. It’s never because anyone feels “silenced” or anything like that, it’s more often that people just feel too busy, or feel their insight isn’t important enough, or is not different enough, or wouldn’t matter anyway. Voter turnout problems, now that I think about it.
These two talks cover a lot more in ways I think are really useful:
There’s also a little anecdote, by Adam Savage, talking about Michael Stevens, that I can’t find (it’s somewhere in his Q&A videos on the Tested channel), so I won’t try to directly quote it. Adam was talking about asking Michael how he manages to stay so respectful of people, even when telling them things they don’t know, and Michael answered something like “Overestimate their intelligence, underestimate their vocabulary.”
I do spend a fair bit of time (a solid business hour a week at least) providing or explaining the correct bureaucratic workflows to customers & even other support staff from different teams. Understanding and communicating those bureaucratic processes is imperative. Knowing when to tear them down / bypass such processes is a good idea, thank you for mentioning it (I have a hard time determining that point).
When [where I work] a task or incident reaches such a point, that’s usually when escalation to management occurs because I and/or my teammembers have exhausted all our available political options for the small bypasses we’re allowed. Management can then run the (what was a task, incident, idea, etc. and turns into the following) problem, change, or project up their chain of command as necessary.
Excellent point regarding obtaining everyone’s input, and how difficult that can be at times. This is especially true if there’s a lack of trust between the individual or group one is interacting with: example, some departments experienced bad support, follow through / communication, and work quality from IT teams in the past, so when I first work with them, there is a necessary stage of trust building that needs to take place before I can meaningfully assist them / perform the work I need to perform. That part (trust building) I’ve been very good at so far (and received excellent feedback from customers about that). +1 on the insight that most people don’t feel silenced (though they may feel ignored in some cases), rather they decide to live with the problem, think it’s too small to mention, think it’s not important enough, etc.
I intend to watch those two YouTube videos this weekend. I’m allowing an educational-exception for those two videos (I’m on a media diet).
“Overestimate their intelligence, underestimate their vocabulary.” I love that! And would like to add: ”..., treat them like a bona fide equal, and listen with deep attentiveness.”
Note: I ran this comment through the Hemingway editor and fixed several mistakes plus reduced the text’s complexity, vocabulary, and tweaked the sentence structure. This comment after adjustments has as a “Grade 13” readability score.
Oh, and whenever you are able, run things through www.hemingwayapp.com and optimize for shortest length and lowest grade level without losing information.
“I didn’t have time to write a short letter, so I wrote a long one instead.”
I ended up as part of a team managing the internal communication & knowledge platform for a company that was at the time (early 2020) about ~100,000 employees, now ~146,000. My area of responsibility now includes over 20,000 employees, but I do not directly oversee anyone. I did not have education or much experience particular to this domain, but somehow became a preferred pick for the role, so make of that what you will.
The strategy I’ve always tried to employ is to treat everyone as intelligent equals, and making as much effort as possible to understand, and earnestly explain, the way things are “supposed” to work in a bureaucratic perspective — who needs to approve, what process needs to be followed, while at the same time consciously addressing instances where what people want/need might be different, and that bureaucracies must be understood in that context. In other words, be aware of the Chesterton’s fence principle, but also be aware that taking down the fence is an option that may need to be discussed.
The most common… I don’t want to say “obstacle” because that feels so strong, but the thing I most often have to be consciously aware of, is getting the input of everyone whose input should be included. You have to actively seek it out, and push people to give input. It’s never because anyone feels “silenced” or anything like that, it’s more often that people just feel too busy, or feel their insight isn’t important enough, or is not different enough, or wouldn’t matter anyway. Voter turnout problems, now that I think about it.
These two talks cover a lot more in ways I think are really useful:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkLGLKcplkM — Concrete Practices to Be a Better Leader: Framing & Intention
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zRaFJHK0S4 — Game Studio Management: Making It Great
There’s also a little anecdote, by Adam Savage, talking about Michael Stevens, that I can’t find (it’s somewhere in his Q&A videos on the Tested channel), so I won’t try to directly quote it. Adam was talking about asking Michael how he manages to stay so respectful of people, even when telling them things they don’t know, and Michael answered something like “Overestimate their intelligence, underestimate their vocabulary.”
I do spend a fair bit of time (a solid business hour a week at least) providing or explaining the correct bureaucratic workflows to customers & even other support staff from different teams. Understanding and communicating those bureaucratic processes is imperative. Knowing when to tear them down / bypass such processes is a good idea, thank you for mentioning it (I have a hard time determining that point).
When [where I work] a task or incident reaches such a point, that’s usually when escalation to management occurs because I and/or my teammembers have exhausted all our available political options for the small bypasses we’re allowed. Management can then run the (what was a task, incident, idea, etc. and turns into the following) problem, change, or project up their chain of command as necessary.
Excellent point regarding obtaining everyone’s input, and how difficult that can be at times. This is especially true if there’s a lack of trust between the individual or group one is interacting with: example, some departments experienced bad support, follow through / communication, and work quality from IT teams in the past, so when I first work with them, there is a necessary stage of trust building that needs to take place before I can meaningfully assist them / perform the work I need to perform. That part (trust building) I’ve been very good at so far (and received excellent feedback from customers about that). +1 on the insight that most people don’t feel silenced (though they may feel ignored in some cases), rather they decide to live with the problem, think it’s too small to mention, think it’s not important enough, etc.
I intend to watch those two YouTube videos this weekend. I’m allowing an educational-exception for those two videos (I’m on a media diet).
“Overestimate their intelligence, underestimate their vocabulary.” I love that! And would like to add: ”..., treat them like a bona fide equal, and listen with deep attentiveness.”
Note: I ran this comment through the Hemingway editor and fixed several mistakes plus reduced the text’s complexity, vocabulary, and tweaked the sentence structure. This comment after adjustments has as a “Grade 13” readability score.
Oh, and whenever you are able, run things through www.hemingwayapp.com and optimize for shortest length and lowest grade level without losing information.
“I didn’t have time to write a short letter, so I wrote a long one instead.”
I believe that the Hemingway Editor would be directly useful for my work emails, thank you for sharing :)
Sadly, I may not get to use it often for that purpose due to data confidentiality concerns (I work at a hospital).
Touche.