What is the overall demand? How many customers would be interested? What specific traits are parents most interested in? Funding is the single biggest obstacle I face, and I will be applying for AstralCodexTen funding.
My best guess is that maybe 500 children worldwide have been born with the benefit of polygenic embryo screening. The market is not particularly large right now, though it’s pretty obvious that could change. If you actually look rationally at the cost-benefit analysis of doing polygenic screening it’s way better than most medical interventions in terms QALYs/$. And that if you JUST look at disease risk and ignore other traits.
From everything I’ve read so far, the really enthusiastic early adopters are most interested in intelligence. But there’s also a healthy demand from people who have a family history of a particular medical condition and want their children to have a reduced risk.
If enough interest is displayed or if I get charitable funding, my gut feeling is that I can offer analysis for <$100 per genome, maybe even <$10.
I’m not sure if you’re aware, but a bunch of us are working on an open-source intelligence predictor. We may actually be able to expand the site to include other traits as well without too much of an effort. But the data mostly comes from European-heavy biobanks. If you could get access to high quality chinese data that would be a huge boon.
Would Westerners accept Chinese IQ/educational attainment metrics? The easiest metric to use would be GaoKao scores, but would that be legible to Westerners?
Many of them would, so long as the predictors actually perform well among those with European ancestry. Also, you could likely combine data from European studies with those from Chinese studies to more precisely pinpoint causal variants. Different genetic ancestry groups tend to have different linkage disequilibrium structures, which is very helpful when you’re trying to pin down which SNP in a group is actually CAUSING the observed difference.
Would ratings of attended college be acceptable?
Possibly? I guess I would have to know more about the college acceptance criteria. And if I want to know more, most parents probably will as well.
Publications/computer code. Would I need to publish a paper to be considered legitimate?
Maybe? If you plan to go through IVF clinics (which I can tell you from personal experience is very difficult), having publications about your approach and your technology will definitely help.
I actually think something that would help far more would be creating tools to help parents estimate the benefits of embryo selection. LifeView.com used to have a calculator page which showed the expected disease reductions from selecting a certain number of embryos. They have taken it down for no apparent reason, and now there are no tools on the internet where parents can see the expected benefits of PGT-P.
It’s so obvious a tool like that is needed. And many others as well.
Reputational concerns. What Western institutions should I be expected to be blacklisted from because of this?
I’m not sure. Many academics would probably view you as a eugenicist (even though many of them aren’t quite sure what they mean when they use that term). You’d probably have some pretty loyal fans too, especially if you made a product that a lot of parents really want to use.
I would really appreciate it if anyone can direct me towards a source of European ancestry genomic data with labeled donor information (education, height, ect).
My best guess is that maybe 500 children worldwide have been born with the benefit of polygenic embryo screening. The market is not particularly large right now, though it’s pretty obvious that could change. If you actually look rationally at the cost-benefit analysis of doing polygenic screening it’s way better than most medical interventions in terms QALYs/$. And that if you JUST look at disease risk and ignore other traits.
From everything I’ve read so far, the really enthusiastic early adopters are most interested in intelligence. But there’s also a healthy demand from people who have a family history of a particular medical condition and want their children to have a reduced risk.
I’m not sure if you’re aware, but a bunch of us are working on an open-source intelligence predictor. We may actually be able to expand the site to include other traits as well without too much of an effort. But the data mostly comes from European-heavy biobanks. If you could get access to high quality chinese data that would be a huge boon.
Many of them would, so long as the predictors actually perform well among those with European ancestry. Also, you could likely combine data from European studies with those from Chinese studies to more precisely pinpoint causal variants. Different genetic ancestry groups tend to have different linkage disequilibrium structures, which is very helpful when you’re trying to pin down which SNP in a group is actually CAUSING the observed difference.
Possibly? I guess I would have to know more about the college acceptance criteria. And if I want to know more, most parents probably will as well.
Maybe? If you plan to go through IVF clinics (which I can tell you from personal experience is very difficult), having publications about your approach and your technology will definitely help.
I actually think something that would help far more would be creating tools to help parents estimate the benefits of embryo selection. LifeView.com used to have a calculator page which showed the expected disease reductions from selecting a certain number of embryos. They have taken it down for no apparent reason, and now there are no tools on the internet where parents can see the expected benefits of PGT-P.
It’s so obvious a tool like that is needed. And many others as well.
I’m not sure. Many academics would probably view you as a eugenicist (even though many of them aren’t quite sure what they mean when they use that term). You’d probably have some pretty loyal fans too, especially if you made a product that a lot of parents really want to use.
https://www.pgscatalog.org/