And in part because it’s socially hard to believe, as a regulator, that you should keep telling everyone “no”, or that almost everything on offer is radically insufficient, when you yourself don’t concretely know what insights and theoretical understanding we’re missing.
That’s not true. We can end up with a regulator that stands in the pose of “prohibit everything”. See IRB in America, for instance: medical experiments are made plainly insurmountable.
That’s not true. We can end up with a regulator that stands in the pose of “prohibit everything”. See IRB in America, for instance: medical experiments are made plainly insurmountable.