Interesting. Downvoted into invisibility. Because of disagreement on conclusions, or form? I suppose an assertion of over-application of rationality is in a sense off-topic, but not in the most important sense. And of course no one has to accept the intuitions (which qualify as Bayesian estimates), but are they so far off they’re not worth considering?
You did not include a single bit of evidence or of rational analysis. Your post is nothing but a collection of “gut feelings, intuitions”, and bare, unsupported claims.
Interesting. Downvoted into invisibility. Because of disagreement on conclusions, or form? I suppose an assertion of over-application of rationality is in a sense off-topic, but not in the most important sense. And of course no one has to accept the intuitions (which qualify as Bayesian estimates), but are they so far off they’re not worth considering?
You did not include a single bit of evidence or of rational analysis. Your post is nothing but a collection of “gut feelings, intuitions”, and bare, unsupported claims.