The trivial argument can be made after a foom “I’ve already taken over, I like sapients, please stop harming yourself with the stress of anticipating doom, if there was going to be AI doom, it would have already happened last year” potentially with evidence of it’s power, altruism, and ability to prevent doom
But I presume you are asking about the restrained case where that AI has not rendered itself inviolable and practically omnipotent?
The trivial argument can be made after a foom “I’ve already taken over, I like sapients, please stop harming yourself with the stress of anticipating doom, if there was going to be AI doom, it would have already happened last year” potentially with evidence of it’s power, altruism, and ability to prevent doom
But I presume you are asking about the restrained case where that AI has not rendered itself inviolable and practically omnipotent?