I think there’s an objection here that value != consumption of material resources, hence the constraints on growth may be far higher than the author calculates. Still, the article is great
I think there’s an objection here that value != consumption of material resources, hence the constraints on growth may be far higher than the author calculates. Still, the article is great.
IMO, I disagree here. I do think nearly all the value came from material consumption, IMO.
I think the general claim this post makes is
incredibly important
well argued
non obvious to many people
I think there’s an objection here that value != consumption of material resources, hence the constraints on growth may be far higher than the author calculates. Still, the article is great
IMO, I disagree here. I do think nearly all the value came from material consumption, IMO.