I’m not in the law field so don’t know any judges or judges to be.
I would offer that in many (most?) cases, the judge is not supposed to offer new thoughts but instead follow precedents.
The legal field is often already very rigorous in applying analytic/rational frameworks to the new problems. The debate comes from which frameworks to use.
I’m not in the law field so don’t know any judges or judges to be.
I would offer that in many (most?) cases, the judge is not supposed to offer new thoughts but instead follow precedents.
The legal field is often already very rigorous in applying analytic/rational frameworks to the new problems. The debate comes from which frameworks to use.