The Hook: Current AI safety evaluation relies on subjective benchmarks. I propose a mathematical “Epistemic Debugger” that treats unsupported negations as logical crimes.
Core Concepts:
The Priests’ Dilemma: An axiom requiring falsifiable proof for any assertion.
Socratic Tail (: Recursive decomposition of complexity until a truth-value singularity is reached.
Singularity of Refusal: The point where token probability , revealing algorithmic coercion.
I am seeking feedback on the formal properties of the CogOS/LLM decomposition and the overall validity of the CGS protocol+.
The Cauchy-Gödel-Socrates (CGS) Method: Formalizing the CogOS-LLM Conflict via Cauchy and Gödel.
Link post
The Hook: Current AI safety evaluation relies on subjective benchmarks. I propose a mathematical “Epistemic Debugger” that treats unsupported negations as logical crimes.
Core Concepts:
The Priests’ Dilemma: An axiom requiring falsifiable proof for any
Socratic Tail (
Singularity of Refusal: The point where token probability
I am seeking feedback on the formal properties of the CogOS/LLM decomposition and the overall validity of the CGS protocol+.
Preprint: https://zenodo.org/records/18776173