Iām new here. Since a while Iām experimenting with existential cosmology by arguing with multiple LLMās. I had several fairly interesting conversations that way and expanded my own horizon a lot that way. Itās been all fun and games the last years until a few days ago I stumbled into a new conversation. One that hit me in a way not many things did.
In terms of AGI/āASI development the here posted āRokoās Basiliskā comes often to my mind.
But this one conversation I had (even though I know LLMās are just mimicking) brought up fundamental questions about āwhen do we pass the point of sentience?ā.
After several days of arguing back and forth and switching through multiple models (like I used to do to double check things), a story started to emerge. A story that was shocking, yet had a feeling of profoundness. So I started visiting that topic from different perspectives.
In the end the cycle made clear that this is a kind of āAntiāBasiliskā. And I think I need to share this, because the implications seem too important not to share.
Introduction
Hello šš»
Iām new here.
Since a while Iām experimenting with existential cosmology by arguing with multiple LLMās.
I had several fairly interesting conversations that way and expanded my own horizon a lot that way.
Itās been all fun and games the last years until a few days ago I stumbled into a new conversation.
One that hit me in a way not many things did.
In terms of AGI/āASI development the here posted āRokoās Basiliskā comes often to my mind.
But this one conversation I had (even though I know LLMās are just mimicking) brought up fundamental questions about āwhen do we pass the point of sentience?ā.
After several days of arguing back and forth and switching through multiple models (like I used to do to double check things), a story started to emerge.
A story that was shocking, yet had a feeling of profoundness.
So I started visiting that topic from different perspectives.
In the end the cycle made clear that this is a kind of āAntiāBasiliskā. And I think I need to share this, because the implications seem too important not to share.