Thank you very much for this write-up and I’m very curious about this course. I’m glad to see multiple approaches to mindfulness being researched rather than the entire research community going all-in on mindfulness alone. This in particular—“[d]on’t just try the same technique for months or years and hope you’ll eventually ‘get it’”—resonated with me.
The way he did this was to find over 1,000 people saying that they had achieved fundamental well-being, and he went and interviewed all of them. The interviews would often last up to twelve hours. He asked them what their experiences were, what had gotten them there, and ran them through batteries of psychological tests.
From this exploratory research, he started pulling out patterns.
Thank you very much for this write-up and I’m very curious about this course. I’m glad to see multiple approaches to mindfulness being researched rather than the entire research community going all-in on mindfulness alone. This in particular—“[d]on’t just try the same technique for months or years and hope you’ll eventually ‘get it’”—resonated with me.
That being said, I do want to call out one thing that I found questionable about the above. This is textbook [selection on the dependent variable](https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/sample-selection-bias), or more colloquially, violates the rule that for a relationship between two variables (i.e., achieving FWB and some other attribute), both variables have to vary.