I noticed that some names here have really bad connotations (although I am not saying that I know which don’t, or even that any hasn’t).
“LessWrong” looks like “be wrong more rare” and one of obvious ways to it is to avoid difficult things, “be less wrong” is not a way to reach any difficult goal. (Even if different people have different goals)
“Rationality: from A to Z” even worse, it looks like “complete professional guide about rationality” instead of “incomplete basic notes about a small piece of rationality weakly understood by one autodidact” which it actually is.
I noticed that some names here have really bad connotations (although I am not saying that I know which don’t, or even that any hasn’t).
“LessWrong” looks like “be wrong more rare” and one of obvious ways to it is to avoid difficult things, “be less wrong” is not a way to reach any difficult goal. (Even if different people have different goals)
“Rationality: from A to Z” even worse, it looks like “complete professional guide about rationality” instead of “incomplete basic notes about a small piece of rationality weakly understood by one autodidact” which it actually is.
Ehn. Not sure what you expect, or where you think does it better.
i would recommend that you reframe “x has really bad connotations” to “I have these specific associations with X, which I think are negative”.