Why do you think that making the vocabulary more specialized would not only allow, but enforce more rational thinking? Were that so, it could be already realized with established structures—ugly though they would sound—and tested. However, such arificial messages would have to be translated, lossily, into ‘human language’ and maybe confuse people even more.
(On a sidenote, I used to want to write a story with aliens whose language required that if ‘someone does something to someone/something’, than the ‘attitude’ of the object of action must be stated: ‘trigger-happy’ would correspond to ‘hair-trigger’...‘never-going-off’. The aliens strove to maximize harmony, always asking themselves ‘what can I do to have the object agree with me?’, with serial taboos etc. Then they met StarFleet, and went to war with those pervs from Earth...)
Why do you think that making the vocabulary more specialized would not only allow, but enforce more rational thinking? Were that so, it could be already realized with established structures—ugly though they would sound—and tested. However, such arificial messages would have to be translated, lossily, into ‘human language’ and maybe confuse people even more.
(On a sidenote, I used to want to write a story with aliens whose language required that if ‘someone does something to someone/something’, than the ‘attitude’ of the object of action must be stated: ‘trigger-happy’ would correspond to ‘hair-trigger’...‘never-going-off’. The aliens strove to maximize harmony, always asking themselves ‘what can I do to have the object agree with me?’, with serial taboos etc. Then they met StarFleet, and went to war with those pervs from Earth...)