Unless we stubbornly insist that liar type paradoxes are deep and mysterious...
That is my position, although I consider it being reasonable rather than stubbornly insisting that nothing can be deep and mysterious.
I think liar type paradoxes are exactly as mysterious as this Python function:
def f(): return not f()
If your intuition is like a Turing complete language, you can’t insist that all functions must terminate.
This function just never returns. That’s not what the Liar’s Paradox is about.
That is my position, although I consider it being reasonable rather than stubbornly insisting that nothing can be deep and mysterious.
I think liar type paradoxes are exactly as mysterious as this Python function:
If your intuition is like a Turing complete language, you can’t insist that all functions must terminate.
This function just never returns. That’s not what the Liar’s Paradox is about.