Does the PLOS study https://mjambon.github.io/vim-vs-emacs/ argue convincingly that emacs is better than Vim?
How do we reason rationally about whether on of the editors is better?
By rigorously defining “better”.
Does the PLOS study https://mjambon.github.io/vim-vs-emacs/ argue convincingly that emacs is better than Vim?
How do we reason rationally about whether on of the editors is better?
By rigorously defining “better”.