I can see myself linking to this more than anything else you’ve ever written. Sing it, brother!
Note that the voting system we have here is trivially open to abuse through mass account creation. We’re not in a position to do anything about that, so I hope that you, the site admins, are defending against it.
Wikipedia is an instructive example. People think it’s some kind of democracy. It is not a democracy: Jimbo is absolute ruler of Wikipedia. He temporarily delegates some of his authority to the bureaucrats, who delegate to the admins, who moderate the ordinary users. All those with power are interested to get ideas from lots of people before making decisions, but it’s very explicit policy that the purpose is to make the best encyclopaedia possible, and democracy doesn’t enter into it. It is heavily policed, and of course that’s the only way it could possibly work.
I can see myself linking to this more than anything else you’ve ever written. Sing it, brother!
Note that the voting system we have here is trivially open to abuse through mass account creation. We’re not in a position to do anything about that, so I hope that you, the site admins, are defending against it.
Wikipedia is an instructive example. People think it’s some kind of democracy. It is not a democracy: Jimbo is absolute ruler of Wikipedia. He temporarily delegates some of his authority to the bureaucrats, who delegate to the admins, who moderate the ordinary users. All those with power are interested to get ideas from lots of people before making decisions, but it’s very explicit policy that the purpose is to make the best encyclopaedia possible, and democracy doesn’t enter into it. It is heavily policed, and of course that’s the only way it could possibly work.