So, I know this sounds like a bit of a cop out, but hear me out. The better debater usually wins the debate, irrespective of techniques.
There’s a lot that goes into a debate. There’s how well you synergize with your partner, how confident you sound, how much research you’ve prepared, how strong of a writer you are… etc. There are times where a good constructive speech can end the debate before your opponent even starts talking, and other times where adamant refusal to accept the facts can convince the judge you’re right. There’s also sheer dumb luck. (Did the judge pay attention?)
I think of it as a lot like poker, in that regard. Ultra-BS is one of many techniques you’d use, like a poker face. It’s not a silver bullet or a free win though (as powerful as it is). Some of our rounds were very close.
If two people both have a poker face, who wins?
Well… I can’t say for sure, but I’d conclude neither side has an advantage over the other. (unless, of course, one person knows the technique better!)
Very interesting!
Obvious question: who wins when the debate is ultra BS Vs ultra BS? Is then the duel back to a rhetoric one?
Glad you enjoyed!
So, I know this sounds like a bit of a cop out, but hear me out. The better debater usually wins the debate, irrespective of techniques.
There’s a lot that goes into a debate. There’s how well you synergize with your partner, how confident you sound, how much research you’ve prepared, how strong of a writer you are… etc. There are times where a good constructive speech can end the debate before your opponent even starts talking, and other times where adamant refusal to accept the facts can convince the judge you’re right. There’s also sheer dumb luck. (Did the judge pay attention?)
I think of it as a lot like poker, in that regard. Ultra-BS is one of many techniques you’d use, like a poker face. It’s not a silver bullet or a free win though (as powerful as it is). Some of our rounds were very close.
If two people both have a poker face, who wins?
Well… I can’t say for sure, but I’d conclude neither side has an advantage over the other. (unless, of course, one person knows the technique better!)