“it’s physically impossible” should probably be “it’s physically possible” to avoid an unnecessary inversion. also, it needs something about “aligned to whom”, as I and many others believe it is either very important or the same technical problem. I added brightness colorcoding to help our mostly-brightness-sensitive vision systems differentiate. It would be good to have an easy to use picker page that would produce something like this, eg perhaps with coda.
can you tell me more about your views on ‘aligned to whom’? edit: especially since you put a low probability on s-risks, which imo would be the main source of this question’s importance
“it’s physically impossible” should probably be “it’s physically possible” to avoid an unnecessary inversion. also, it needs something about “aligned to whom”, as I and many others believe it is either very important or the same technical problem. I added brightness colorcoding to help our mostly-brightness-sensitive vision systems differentiate. It would be good to have an easy to use picker page that would produce something like this, eg perhaps with coda.
here’s mine
can you tell me more about your views on ‘aligned to whom’? edit: especially since you put a low probability on s-risks, which imo would be the main source of this question’s importance