What he said immediately after the part you mention was: “The Art must have a purpose other than itself, or it collapses into infinite recursion”
He wasn’t talking about pseudo-rationality. When he talks about “The Art”, he’s talking about rationality.
And he’s wrong: truth points to itself.
What he said immediately after the part you mention was: “The Art must have a purpose other than itself, or it collapses into infinite recursion”
He wasn’t talking about pseudo-rationality. When he talks about “The Art”, he’s talking about rationality.
And he’s wrong: truth points to itself.