“how can you use Hebbian learning, an unsupervised-learning tool, to get supervised stuff????”
Thanks for the precision. I guess the key insight for this is: they’re both Turing complete.
“be able to reconstruct the data from a smaller representation”
Doesn’t this sound like the thalamus includes a smaller representation than the cortices?
it would be a little weird to apply clustering (an unsupervised learning technique) to a supervised task.
Actually this is one form a feature engineering., I ’m confident you can find many examples on kaggle! Yes, you’re most probably right this is telling something important, like it’s telling something important that in some sense all NP-complete problems are arguably the same problem.
Thanks for the precision. I guess the key insight for this is: they’re both Turing complete.
Doesn’t this sound like the thalamus includes a smaller representation than the cortices?
Actually this is one form a feature engineering., I ’m confident you can find many examples on kaggle! Yes, you’re most probably right this is telling something important, like it’s telling something important that in some sense all NP-complete problems are arguably the same problem.