Suppose there exist some non-consequentialist moral philosophies which the right arguments could convince you of, with sufficient strength that you would (temporarily, for at least an hour) become a fanatic.
Suppose there was such a consequentialist philosophy. Would it turn out to be correct, or incorrect?
Suppose there was such a consequentialist philosophy. Would it turn out to be correct, or incorrect?
I don’t think I understand the question. Probably not, since the space of such philosophies is very large.