Or: it says “This is undecidable in Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory plus the axiom of choice”. In the case of P=NP, I might believe it
Ask again, with another famously unsolved math problem. Repeat until it stops saying that or you run out of problems you know.
I would not believe a purported god if it said all 9 remaining Clay math prize problems are undecidable.
So maybe some form of forced socialism is right. But you don’t seem interested in considering that possibility. Why not?
Why not?
It seems like you have some pre-established moral principles which you are using in your arguments against utilitarianism. Right?
To me it seems that most people making difficult moral decisions make complicated compromises between competing principles.