I think there may be a tendency for the here-present audience to overanalyze and underpractice.
I think the following information is important for understanding this problem matter:
(1) Anyone attracted to this site will likely be a highly intelligent individual.
(2) IQ is more closely bundled around 100 for girls than it is for guys.
Implication: This here audience is mostly male.
(3) People with IQ differences of more than 2 standard deviations don’t get along that great (aren’t peers).
(4) Socialization with peers at a young age is crucial to social development.
(5) Primary schools bundle together people of all IQs indiscriminately.
Implication: Most of us in this here audience have been stunted in our social development by lacking peers early on, when it’s important.
Implication: Because extreme IQs are much rarer in girls than in guys, we have to either compete for a few highly intelligent, intellectually stimulating females who may share our lack in social skills, OR settle for merely above average IQ females who may lack some intellectual sparkle, but may be easier to find and better socially developed.
(6) You don’t learn to dance by watching videos of people dancing, and you don’t develop social skills by reasoning about them. You need to practice.
Implication: People like us, who need to develop our social networks and social skills at a later age, will necessarily make fools of ourselves in the process. This mustn’t stop us. We are belatedly developing skills that we should have picked up as kids, and practice is the only way to do it.
Jesus Christ. “Things aren’t always logical.” The hallmark of a magic-thinker. Of course everything is always logical. The only case it doesn’t seem that way is when one lacks understanding.