RSS

Moore’s Law

TagLast edit: 22 Oct 2012 10:20 UTC by Kaj_Sotala

Moore’s law is a term attributed to Intel founder Gordon E. Moore who observed in 1965 that the number of transistors that could be purchased inexpensively and placed on an integrated circuit doubles every year. In 1975, he revised his estimate to every two years. It is often discussed as a doubling every 18 months, but that is a separate claim by David House, Intel executive, of overall chip performance. Moore’s law been approximately correct for four decades.

Though current CMOS technology is predicted to be nonviable below a certain size, many other technologies offer the potential for far greater miniaturization. This may delay Moore’s law temporarily while the new technologies enter full-scale production. An end to Moore’s law has often been predicted, but has failed to materialize so far.

Moore’s law is often cited as a reason to expect the creation of an AGI in the future, and is crucial for the possibility of whole brain emulation.

References

The First Room-Tem­per­a­ture Am­bi­ent-Pres­sure Superconductor

Annapurna26 Jul 2023 2:27 UTC
35 points
28 comments1 min readLW link
(arxiv.org)

My side of an ar­gu­ment with Ja­cob Can­nell about chip in­ter­con­nect losses

Steven Byrnes21 Jun 2023 13:33 UTC
144 points
11 comments11 min readLW link

Com­pute Trends — Com­par­i­son to OpenAI’s AI and Compute

12 Mar 2022 18:09 UTC
23 points
3 comments3 min readLW link

Pro­ject­ing com­pute trends in Ma­chine Learning

7 Mar 2022 15:32 UTC
59 points
5 comments6 min readLW link

Com­pute Trends Across Three eras of Ma­chine Learning

16 Feb 2022 14:18 UTC
94 points
13 comments2 min readLW link

Moore’s Law, AI, and the pace of progress

Veedrac11 Dec 2021 3:02 UTC
125 points
38 comments24 min readLW link

Com­pute Re­search Ques­tions and Met­rics—Trans­for­ma­tive AI and Com­pute [4/​4]

lennart28 Nov 2021 22:49 UTC
7 points
0 comments16 min readLW link

Com­pute Gover­nance and Con­clu­sions—Trans­for­ma­tive AI and Com­pute [3/​4]

lennart14 Oct 2021 8:23 UTC
13 points
0 comments5 min readLW link

Fore­cast­ing Com­pute—Trans­for­ma­tive AI and Com­pute [2/​4]

lennart2 Oct 2021 15:54 UTC
17 points
0 comments19 min readLW link

Trans­for­ma­tive AI and Com­pute [Sum­mary]

lennart26 Sep 2021 11:41 UTC
13 points
0 comments9 min readLW link

What is Com­pute? - Trans­for­ma­tive AI and Com­pute [1/​4]

lennart23 Sep 2021 16:25 UTC
27 points
9 comments19 min readLW link

[Question] Has Moore’s Law ac­tu­ally slowed down?

Matthew Barnett20 Aug 2019 19:18 UTC
14 points
6 comments1 min readLW link

Sce­nario analy­ses for tech­nolog­i­cal progress for the next decade

VipulNaik14 Jul 2014 16:31 UTC
14 points
13 comments13 min readLW link

Why AI may not foom

John_Maxwell24 Mar 2013 8:11 UTC
29 points
81 comments12 min readLW link

Slow­ing Moore’s Law: Why You Might Want To and How You Would Do It

gwern10 Mar 2012 4:22 UTC
34 points
89 comments1 min readLW link

Why is mem­ory but not CPU fol­low­ing Moore’s law?

PhilGoetz23 Oct 2011 6:46 UTC
2 points
0 comments1 min readLW link
No comments.