I’ve found the review process a good insight into what goes on on LW. From the posts nominated and the comments and feedback they have generated I have more of an understanding of general topics but I have a lot of questions about definitions...
A couple of thoughts:
improving the LessWrong community’s longterm feedback and reward cycle.
Feedback risks punishment.
“Reward cycle” is an interesting phrase - More karma sharing between the collective? Or rewarding interactions and the development of ideas/processes/beliefs/understanding through debate and learning?
What is the aim/dream for the book? On a scale of globally-acclaimed to something solid for the collective to hold.
A nomination/review cycle for 2017 (and back) would be worth doing if creating a physical book for wider release.
I’ve found the review process a good insight into what goes on on LW. From the posts nominated and the comments and feedback they have generated I have more of an understanding of general topics but I have a lot of questions about definitions...
A couple of thoughts:
Feedback risks punishment.
“Reward cycle” is an interesting phrase - More karma sharing between the collective? Or rewarding interactions and the development of ideas/processes/beliefs/understanding through debate and learning?
What is the aim/dream for the book? On a scale of globally-acclaimed to something solid for the collective to hold.
A nomination/review cycle for 2017 (and back) would be worth doing if creating a physical book for wider release.