There haven’t been anthropogenic risks that killed 10% of humans. The anthropic update on “10% of people killed” is pretty small. (World War 2 killed ~2% and feels like the strongest example against the “Them” position.)
You could believe that most risks are all-or-nothing, in which case I agree the “Them” position is considerably weaker due to anthropic effects.
Copied from a comment above:
There haven’t been anthropogenic risks that killed 10% of humans. The anthropic update on “10% of people killed” is pretty small. (World War 2 killed ~2% and feels like the strongest example against the “Them” position.)
You could believe that most risks are all-or-nothing, in which case I agree the “Them” position is considerably weaker due to anthropic effects.