No, I do understand well what diegocaleiro intended to communicate. It’s just that what he intended to communicate isn’t the only thing that he communicates.
Are you saying that you are deliberately interpreting his statement in a way that you know wasn’t intended?
diegocaleiro stated goal is about understanding that conflict.
I’m interpreting his statement in a way that shifts the attention towards the reason there’s conflict between evolutionary psychology and feminism.
I don’t think it’s useful to address the statement in a way that doesn’t help with understanding the conflict between evolutionary psychology and feminism.
There’s also the meta level. You won’t understand the whole conflict between evolutionary psychology and feminism as long as you think that the only part of communication that matters is the part that the sender intends to send.
Are you saying that you are deliberately interpreting his statement in a way that you know wasn’t intended?
diegocaleiro stated goal is about understanding that conflict.
I’m interpreting his statement in a way that shifts the attention towards the reason there’s conflict between evolutionary psychology and feminism. I don’t think it’s useful to address the statement in a way that doesn’t help with understanding the conflict between evolutionary psychology and feminism.
There’s also the meta level. You won’t understand the whole conflict between evolutionary psychology and feminism as long as you think that the only part of communication that matters is the part that the sender intends to send.