I think it fits better if cos = you have it and don’t care that you have it, etc. I don’t mean it fits what you were saying originally, but in terms of conceptual schema, I think the integral of w(s) is cleaner.
Sorry, you are right, I got confused.
In the OP, 0th order was your wanting the thing, right? So you were right that I gave him cos...
No, “you want it” corresponds to w, “don’t want to want to want it,” is -w^3/3!, etc.
I think it fits better if cos = you have it and don’t care that you have it, etc. I don’t mean it fits what you were saying originally, but in terms of conceptual schema, I think the integral of w(s) is cleaner.
Sorry, you are right, I got confused.
In the OP, 0th order was your wanting the thing, right? So you were right that I gave him cos...
No, “you want it” corresponds to w, “don’t want to want to want it,” is -w^3/3!, etc.