g- I think you’ve misread the article. There is nothing to worry about, of course, there are only possibilities to consider.
The point the article makes is not dependant on any particular notion of free will.
Stapp advocates the von Nuemann, Wigner formulation of QM, the only existing formulation that produces a rationally coherent idea of the reality that lies behind our experiences. IMHO
Of course, one problem that people have with this formulation is that it agrees with with the experienced fact that our thoughts can influence our actions.
Would anyone reading this post, or studying decision theory, or trying to overcome a bias, deny that?
g- I think you’ve misread the article. There is nothing to worry about, of course, there are only possibilities to consider. The point the article makes is not dependant on any particular notion of free will. Stapp advocates the von Nuemann, Wigner formulation of QM, the only existing formulation that produces a rationally coherent idea of the reality that lies behind our experiences. IMHO Of course, one problem that people have with this formulation is that it agrees with with the experienced fact that our thoughts can influence our actions. Would anyone reading this post, or studying decision theory, or trying to overcome a bias, deny that?