It does not, but consider 2 adaptations: A: responds to babies and more strongly to bunnies B: responds to babies only
B would seem more adaptive. Why didn’t humans evolve it?
Plausible explanation: A is more simple and therefore more likely to result from a random DNA fluctuation. Is anyone doing research into which kinds of adaptations are more likely to appear like this?
It does not, but consider 2 adaptations:
A: responds to babies and more strongly to bunnies
B: responds to babies only
B would seem more adaptive. Why didn’t humans evolve it?
Plausible explanation: A is more simple and therefore more likely to result from a random DNA fluctuation.
Is anyone doing research into which kinds of adaptations are more likely to appear like this?