I found that 51% of effective altruists had given blood compared to 47% of others—a difference which did not reach statistical significance.
I gave blood before I was an EA but stopped because I didn’t think it was effective. Does being veg*n correlate with calling oneself an EA? That seems like a more effective intervention.
The question does ask whether people have ever given blood, though. You could consider people only among a sufficiently old cohort (so that they would have had a chance to give blood before they would likely have identified as EA), and see if there’s any correlation.
I gave blood before I was an EA but stopped because I didn’t think it was effective. Does being veg*n correlate with calling oneself an EA? That seems like a more effective intervention.
The question does ask whether people have ever given blood, though. You could consider people only among a sufficiently old cohort (so that they would have had a chance to give blood before they would likely have identified as EA), and see if there’s any correlation.
The term refers to a specific subculture that calls itself “Effective Altruism”.
I’m sorry, I’m not sure what you’re saying? I’m aware of what “EA” stands for, if that’s the confusion.